Comparison among three different methods of vegetable tissue analysis.

Authors

  • Sandro Vaccaro
  • Eleandro José Brun Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Mauro Valdir Schumacher Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Flávia Gizele König Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Isabel Sandra Kleinpaul Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
  • Denise Ester Ceconi Universidade Federa de Santa Maria

Keywords:

Method of chemical analysis, Litter

Abstract

The objective of the present work was to compare three different methods of chemical analysis of vegetable tissue: the method of nitro-percloric digestion, Tedesco et al. and Adler & Wilcox. As material was analyzed 03 samples of the fraction leaves of the litter collected in each one of the two Seasonal Deciduous Forest fragments, collected in August of 1990 in the forest of the "Hill of the Elephant" (Santa Maria city, RS) and in August of 1995 in Santa Tereza´s forest, RS. The analyses were made at the Laboratory of Forest Ecology, in Department of Forest Sciences of UFSM. The results evidenced that the content of P extracted for the method of Adler & Wilcox and the nitro-percloric digestion was similar. The contents of K extracted for the three methods were similar. The method of nitropercloric digestion extracted high contents of Ca and relatively superiors of Mg. The method Tedesco et al. it presented smaller extraction efficiency for P, Ca and Mg. In spite of the largest extraction efficiency, the method of digestion nitropercloric presents larger use risks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

MACHADO, P. F. S.; LONGHI, S. J. Aspectos florísticos e fitossociológicos do "Morro do Elefante", Santa Maria, RS. Ciência Rural, Santa Maria, v. 20, n. 3-4, p. 261-280, 1990.
MORENO, J. A. Clima do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Secretaria da Agricultura, 1961. 73 p.
SARRUGE, J. R.; HAAG, H. P. Análise química das plantas. Piracicaba: ESALQ, 1974. 56 p.
STRECK, E. V.; KÄMPF, N.; DALMOLIN, R. S. D.; KLAMT, E.; NASCIMENTO, P. C.; SCHNEIDER, P. Solos do Rio Grande do Sul. Porto Alegre: Emater/RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 2002. 107 p.
TEDESCO, M. J.; VOLKWEISS,S. J.; BOHNEN, H. Análises de solo, plantas e outros materiais. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Solos, 1985. Paginação irregular. (UFRGS. Boletim Técnico, 5).
TEDESCO, M. J.; GIANELLO, C.; BISSANI, C. A.; BOHNEN, H.; VOLKWEISS, S. J. Análise de solo, plantas e outros materiais. 2. ed. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Solos, 1995. 118 p. (UFRGS. Boletim Técnico, 5).
VACCARO, S. Caracterização fitossociológica de três fases sucessionais de uma Floresta Estacional Decidual, no município de Santa Tereza - RS. 1997. 92 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia Florestal) - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria.

Downloads

Published

2004-06-30

How to Cite

VACCARO, Sandro; BRUN, Eleandro José; SCHUMACHER, Mauro Valdir; KÖNIG, Flávia Gizele; KLEINPAUL, Isabel Sandra; CECONI, Denise Ester. Comparison among three different methods of vegetable tissue analysis. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, [S. l.], n. 48, p. 15–28, 2004. Disponível em: https://pfb.sede.embrapa.br/pfb/article/view/1593. Acesso em: 25 apr. 2026.

Issue

No. 48 (2004): jan./jun.

Section

Articles

License

Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (PFB) licenses all its published content under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

  • Copyright: Authors maintain the copyright to their work. PFB holds the right to the first publication, and use rights under the specific Creative Commons deed.
  • Editing and revision: PFB reserves the right to edit the original manuscript to ensure conformity with the standards, spelling and grammar of the Portuguese language, while respecting the style of the author(s). The final version of the text shall be sent to the corresponding author for approval prior to publication.
  • Sharing and reuse: The CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license permits sharing of the article in its original version, as long as credit is given to the journal and the authors and the material is not used for commercial purposes. No alterations or adaptations of the original content are permitted.
  • Figures and illustrations: Figures and illustrations published in PFB may only be used with express prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
  • Disclaimer: The opinions and beliefs expressed in the texts published herein are the exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.