Forest regulation comparison of forest outgrower schemes projects with own areas of forestry companies

Authors

  • Rafael Rode Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Florestas
  • Helio Garcia Leite Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Marcio Leles Romarco Oliveira Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Daniel Henrique Breda Binoti Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares Ribeiro Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Agostinho Lopes Souza Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Márcio Lopes Silva Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal
  • Diogo Nepomuceno Cosenza Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4336/2015.pfb.35.81.760

Keywords:

Forest planning, Management regimes, Forest optimization, Rural properties

Abstract

This study compared the forest planning of outgrower schemes projects with own areas of forestry companies´ areas. The total area of the companies was 41,178 ha distributed in 299 stands, and the outgrower areas were 2,445 ha distributed in 144 properties. The planning involved linear programming of areas in order to maximize the equivalent annuity (EA), under the condition (constraints) of a regulated structure at the end of planning. Two scenarios were evaluated: a) individual model - areas of outgrower schemes and companies in separate models, and b) single model - areas of outgrower schemes and companies in the same programming model. The EA difference of the individual to the single model was unfavorable to outgrowers, since it reduced its value by 14%. In the companies´ areas, the solution of the single regulation was favorable, increasing the EA in approximately 1%. It was also verified in a new scenario of the single model that if the wood of outgrowers were sold by stumpage, the global EA of these areas would increase by 0.9%, thus more attractive to landowners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Rafael Rode, Universidade Federal do Oeste do Pará, Instituto de Biodiversidade e Florestas

http://lattes.cnpq.br/7890873399287123

Helio Garcia Leite, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

 http://lattes.cnpq.br/5418297150342702

Marcio Leles Romarco Oliveira, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

http://lattes.cnpq.br/1808132114787261

Daniel Henrique Breda Binoti, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

http://lattes.cnpq.br/2540451543790663

Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares Ribeiro, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

 http://lattes.cnpq.br/0257744922714589

Agostinho Lopes Souza, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

http://lattes.cnpq.br/6558112873339485

Márcio Lopes Silva, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

http://lattes.cnpq.br/9782872857744532

Diogo Nepomuceno Cosenza, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal

http://lattes.cnpq.br/0496006405127895

Downloads

Published

2015-03-26

How to Cite

RODE, Rafael; LEITE, Helio Garcia; OLIVEIRA, Marcio Leles Romarco; BINOTI, Daniel Henrique Breda; RIBEIRO, Carlos Antonio Alvares Soares; SOUZA, Agostinho Lopes; SILVA, Márcio Lopes; COSENZA, Diogo Nepomuceno. Forest regulation comparison of forest outgrower schemes projects with own areas of forestry companies. Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira, [S. l.], v. 35, n. 81, p. 11–19, 2015. DOI: 10.4336/2015.pfb.35.81.760. Disponível em: https://pfb.sede.embrapa.br/pfb/article/view/760. Acesso em: 24 apr. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 35 No. 81 (2015): jan./mar.

Section

Articles

License

Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (PFB) licenses all its published content under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

  • Copyright: Authors maintain the copyright to their work. PFB holds the right to the first publication, and use rights under the specific Creative Commons deed.
  • Editing and revision: PFB reserves the right to edit the original manuscript to ensure conformity with the standards, spelling and grammar of the Portuguese language, while respecting the style of the author(s). The final version of the text shall be sent to the corresponding author for approval prior to publication.
  • Sharing and reuse: The CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license permits sharing of the article in its original version, as long as credit is given to the journal and the authors and the material is not used for commercial purposes. No alterations or adaptations of the original content are permitted.
  • Figures and illustrations: Figures and illustrations published in PFB may only be used with express prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
  • Disclaimer: The opinions and beliefs expressed in the texts published herein are the exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC