Usage of the pruned log index for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) and slash pine (Pinus elliottii)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2010.pfb.30.62.119Keywords:
Pruning, pruned log index, clearwood, Pinus, lathed veneers.Abstract
The assessment of the quality of clearwood produced in pruned plantations of pine is necessary, especially to set price and know the utilization potential. The pruned log index (PLI), index used in Chile and New Zealand to characterize the quality of the logs, is a function of measurable variables of each log as diameter with defects, diameter 1.3 m from the largest end and the ratio between the cylinder volume common to the entire length of the log and the scaling volume through the method Smalian. This study aims at evaluating the ITP usage for slash pine (Pinus elliottii) logs at the age 24 years and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) at 19, harvested
in the regions of Ibaiti, Paraná, and Itapeva, São Paulo. The PLI values did not exceed 2.3, which indicates that there is little clearwood on the logs. This has been proven through the veneering results, in which the potentially clear volume in relation to the log volume ranged between 52% and 55%, but 10.3% at the maximum, was turned into clearwood veneer. The slicing procedure in the lathe proved to be suitable, since it allowed the diameter of the knotty core to be measured as soon as the knot came out. The PLI showed itself as applicable for the Brazilian conditions.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2010 Denise Jeton Cardoso, Julio Eduardo Arce

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.