Stratification criteria to fit taper functions on pine boles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2014.pfb.34.79.659Keywords:
Form of boles, Accuracy of functions, Estimate standard errorAbstract
This paper aimed to evaluate the accuracy of taper functions fitted with and without stratification on Pinus sp. trees. Three strata were allocated using diameter at 1.3 m above the ground, artificial form factor and Schiffel´s form quotient as stratification criteria. Schöepfer, Kozak et al. Hradetzky, Garcia et al., Ormerod and Demaerchalk taper functions were tested and the one which best fitted to the total population was selected by statistics standard error of estimate in percentage (syx%), adjusted coefficient of determination (R²aj.) and residual scatterplots. After this, the selected function was fitted with data stratified and the gain of accuracy was evaluated by two statistical methods. As results, Hradetzky´s function adjusted better when compared to the others. Equations obtained for the total population and for strata are statistically different. Stratification by form factor and by form quotient provide considerable reduction of errors, reaching up to 50%, however it was not observed expressive reduction for stratification by diameter at 1.3 above the ground. So, the stratification by form factor is recommended for fitting taper functions to boles of Pinus sp.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.