Volumetric estimates in a stand of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in Southwest Bahia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2013.pfb.33.76.459Keywords:
Volumetric models, Form factor, Form quotientAbstract
The objective of this work was to select volumetric models and evaluate the efficiency of three methods to estimate the wood volume of Pinus caribaea var. hondurensis in an even-aged stand in Vitória da Conquista, State of Bahia, Brazil. After the trees were selected, they were cut down and their volume were rigorously measured to calculate total and commercial individual volume, with and without bark. Eight volumetric models were adjusted. Higher performance models were selected based on the weighted value of the statistical parameters scores. The volumes obtained by measurement were compared to those obtained by form factor, form quotient and adjusted models. The Stoate model was the most efficient in estimating total and commercial volumes with bark. The Stoate model and the modified Naslund model had better performance in estimating the total and commercial volumes, respectively, without bark. The form factor and the volumetric models are recommended for accurately predicting wood volume for this species.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Lara Clímaco de Melo, Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto, Francisco Garcia Romeiro Barbosa de Oliveira, Adalberto Brito de Novaes

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.