Silvopastoral Systems as a Support for Rural Development in the Southwest Region of Rio Grande do Sul State, Brazil
Keywords:
Extensive cattle raising, forestry production, silvopastoral system, economic evaluation, Eucalyptus grandis.Abstract
An economic viability analysis was performed for different eucalypt wood production systems (Eucalyptus grandis Hill ex. Maiden) in two rural properties located in Alegrete County, RS. The traditional pasture system was compared with two other alternative systems, one of them represented by a pasture land converted to homogeneous eucalypt plantation by using two plant densities (2,222 and 1,111 trees.ha-1) and the other represented by a silvopastoral system containing 1,000 and 500 trees.ha-1. The results were analyzed by determining the Internal Retuurn Rate (IRR) and comparing it to the Minimum Attractive Rate (MAR). The alternatives with and without land value were evaluated taking into account the wood price variation (gain and lost of 5%) and the wood yield (gain and lost of 10%). Considering the land value, all alternatives showed that the IRR was lower than the MAR (3.72%). The sensibility analysis showed that when price and yield of the wood had their values increased, for the majority of alternatives considering the practice of thinning, the IRR was higher than the MAR, except to silvopastoral system containing 500 trees.ha-1. The conclusion was that, the forest component implementation is economically viable for the land owner, except by the fact that it is necessary to disregard the land value in this approach.Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.