Hypsometric relation for candeia (Eremanthus erythropappus) under different planting spacings in Minas Gerais, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2012.pfb.32.71.257Keywords:
Hypsometric models, Height/diameter relation, Identity of modelsAbstract
The objective of this work was to adjust traditional models of hypsometric relations for homogeneous candeia stands, under different initial spacings. Ten models were adjusted for hypsometric relations. The assessment criteria obeyed the highest determination coefficient and the lowest standard error of estimate in percentage. The F test was also evaluated, as well as the significance of the regression coefficients, the graphical analysis of the residues and the identity test when the same model was selected for different treatments. It was observed that, over time, the hypsometric curves reduce their tilt, move to the right and elevate, reducing the interval among them from the sixth year. The traditional hypsometric relation models as Henricksen, Stofells, Assman, Trorey and Curtis are efficient to estimate the total height of candeia in homogeneous stands and under different initial spacing in Minas Gerais State, BrazilDownloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Emanuel José Gomes de Araújo, Allan Libanio Pelissari, Hassan Camil David, José Roberto Soares Scolforo, Sylvio Péllico Netto, Vinícius Augusto Morais

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.