Amazonian timber species: richness, popular names and their peculiarities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2018.pfb.38e201801567Keywords:
Forest management, Biodiversity, Botanical nomenclatureAbstract
The process of botanical identification in commercial forest inventories in Amazon may involve several errors and entail losses to forest management. A common error is the variation of popular names, which have regional peculiarities and can be attributed to several species simultaneously. This study aims to analyze the richness of timber species exploited in the Brazilian Amazon and verify the regional variations of popular names of main species, aiming to identify patterns and cases of fidelity. Information on exploited and potential commercial trees was explored in 10 sustainable forest management plans in different categories and regions of the Brazilian Amazon. The analyzes showed high richness of commercial species, with low similarity among species, indicating local peculiarities for main species. Popular names presented a wide variation, with two distinct tendencies: use of the same popular name for several botanical species and use of several popular names for a single botanical species. Cases of fidelity were detected for popular names of main timber species. However, popular names are strongly related to botanical genera and families, and may vary intensely when the analysis requires identification at species level.Downloads
References
Colwell. R. K. et al. Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction: extrapolation and comparison of assemblages. Plant Ecology, v. 5, p. 3-21, 2011. DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtr044.
Ferreira, G. C. & Hopkins, M. J. G. Manual de identificação botânica e anatômica: angelim. Belém, PA: Embrapa Amazônia Oriental, 2004. 101 p.
Janzen, D. H. Setting up tropical biodiversity for conservation through non-damaging use: participation by parataxonomists. Journal of Applied Ecology, v. 41, p. 181-187, 2004. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2004.00879.x.
Lang, C. et al. Discrimination of taxonomic identity at species, genus and family levels using Fourier Transformed Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-NIR). Forest Ecology and Management, v. 406, p. 219-227, 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.003.
Obermuller, F. A. et al. Guia Ilustrado e manual de arquitetura foliar para espécies madeireiras da Amazônia Ocidental. Rio Branco, AC: G. K. Noronha, 2011. 101 p.
Ribeiro, J. E. L. S. et al. Flora da Reserva Ducke: guia de identificação das plantas vasculares de uma floresta de terra-firme na Amazônia Central. Manaus, AM: INPA, 1999. 816 p.
Ter Steege, H. et al. A spatial model of tree diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation, v. 12, p. 2255-2277, 2003. DOI: 10.1023/A:1024593414624.
The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Botanical Journal Linnieu Society, v. 181, p. 1-20, 2016. DOI: 10.1111/boj.12385.
Toledo, M. et al. Patterns and determinants of floristic variation across Lowland Forests of Bolivia. Biotropica, v. 43, n. 4, p. 405-413, 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-7429.2010. 00711.x
Veríssimo, A. et al. Priority areas for establishing National Forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Conservation Ecology, v. 6, n. 1, p. 4, 2002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.