Comparing logistic function and clutter prognosis models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2016.pfb.36.87.1230Keywords:
Forest Yield, Forests Biometric, Non-linear ModelsAbstract
The aim this study was to compare the performance of two non-linear models and the classic Clutter´s system on volume prognosis in fully stocking Eucalyptus stands from Espírito Santo, Brazil. Mean standard error percentual, Akaike and Bayesian criteria, supplemented by graphical analysis were used to evaluate models fit. Models performance presented better results up to four times when covariables were included in the adjustment process. It was observed that logistic function with covariables was superior than it´s original form and more appropriate then Clutter´s system. The results showed better results of non-linear system to modeling forest growth and yield indicating forest rotation near five years. These results are consistent with Eucalyptus plantation for biomass in Brazil.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Juliana Carneiro Gonçalves, Samuel de Padua Chaves e Carvalho, Antonio Donizette de Oliveira, Lucas Rezende Gomide

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
PFB reserves the right to edit manuscripts to correct grammar/spelling, improve clarity, and comply with the journal’s standards while maintaining the style of the authors.
The final version will be sent to the corresponding author for approval.
Published articles become the property of PFB.
Manuscripts may be used after publication without prior authorization from PFB, as long as the journal is credited.
Warning: figures published in PFB may only be reused with prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
All content in PFB is licensed under Creative Commons attribution (type BY-NC-ND).
The opinions and concepts expressed in manuscripts are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.