Comparing logistic function and clutter prognosis models
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4336/2016.pfb.36.87.1230Keywords:
Forest Yield, Forests Biometric, Non-linear ModelsAbstract
The aim this study was to compare the performance of two non-linear models and the classic Clutter´s system on volume prognosis in fully stocking Eucalyptus stands from Espírito Santo, Brazil. Mean standard error percentual, Akaike and Bayesian criteria, supplemented by graphical analysis were used to evaluate models fit. Models performance presented better results up to four times when covariables were included in the adjustment process. It was observed that logistic function with covariables was superior than it´s original form and more appropriate then Clutter´s system. The results showed better results of non-linear system to modeling forest growth and yield indicating forest rotation near five years. These results are consistent with Eucalyptus plantation for biomass in Brazil.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Juliana Carneiro Gonçalves, Samuel de Padua Chaves e Carvalho, Antonio Donizette de Oliveira, Lucas Rezende Gomide

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Pesquisa Florestal Brasileira (PFB) licenses all its published content under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).
- Copyright: Authors maintain the copyright to their work. PFB holds the right to the first publication, and use rights under the specific Creative Commons deed.
- Editing and revision: PFB reserves the right to edit the original manuscript to ensure conformity with the standards, spelling and grammar of the Portuguese language, while respecting the style of the author(s). The final version of the text shall be sent to the corresponding author for approval prior to publication.
- Sharing and reuse: The CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license permits sharing of the article in its original version, as long as credit is given to the journal and the authors and the material is not used for commercial purposes. No alterations or adaptations of the original content are permitted.
- Figures and illustrations: Figures and illustrations published in PFB may only be used with express prior authorization from Embrapa Forestry.
- Disclaimer: The opinions and beliefs expressed in the texts published herein are the exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and not PFB.


